01 / SOURCE
Where the signal originates
A real provider with a named scope and authority.
Methodology
A decision is only as strong as its evidence chain.
The first screen stays simple. The full chain remains available whenever you need to verify why a conclusion exists.
Where the name comes from
UNCLMD reads as unclaimed: what no one has taken yet. The product is named after the state it looks for, not after the checking it does.
02 / OBSERVATION
What the provider returned
The query, response state and observation time are preserved.
03 / EVIDENCE
What can be stated
Observations become bounded and traceable claims.
04 / FINDING
Why it matters
Evidence can support a collision, a condition or an explicit unknown.
05 / DECISION
What to do next
Only supported findings contribute to the territory decision.
How to read the evidence
CONFIDENCE
Strength of a specific evidence claim, never a fabricated global score.
COMPLETENESS
How much of the expected source set returned a usable result.
FRESHNESS
When an observation was made and whether it still supports the decision.
PROVENANCE
The source, query and reference behind a claim.
Canonical decisions
OPEN
No material collision was found inside completed coverage.
OPEN WITH CONDITIONS
The territory can be explored with named risks or gaps to resolve.
CONTESTED
Material evidence indicates an occupied or conflicting territory.
INSUFFICIENT DATA
Coverage is not strong enough to support a directional conclusion.